Diddy’s Legal Team Accuses Federal Prosecutors Of Sharing An Edited Version Of The 2016 Hotel Video Clip To Make Him Look More Dangerous Than He Is!

( PHOTO : Getty Images)

In preparation for his scheduled bail hearing, Diddy is reportedly hurling accusations against Federal prosecutors in issuing claims of altering footage regarding the 2016 hotel incident between him and Cassie!

According to exclusive reports from TMZ Diddy and his legal team have officially filed new court documents ahead of his November 22nd scheduled bail hearing. Court documents state that prosecutors allegedly edited the sequence of events from the March 2016 surveillance video.

Diddy’s attorney reportedly declared that prosecutors are in possession of the original video. However, he believes an edited version was shared with the overseeing judge as the, “most powerful evidence of danger and obstruction.”

Diddy and his legal team are currently arguing that prosecutors are working to make him look more dangerous than he actually is. He insists that there is no evidence of a freak-off in the video only a “domestic dispute in which he ran down the hall of the hotel to recover his clothes and cellphone.”

As we previously reported Diddy went viral across social media earlier this year making major headlines as he is seen physically assaulting Cassie at a Los Angeles hotel on March 5, 2016. The video clip was made public by CNN.

One of Diddy’s appointed attorney’s Alexandria Sharpio has argued that the allegedly “altered video— omitted key scenes and presented events materially out of order.” It was “an edited, manipulated version of the video published by CNN.”

USA Today reports that Diddy’s legal team has hired forensic video analyst, Conor McCourt, to compare the original footage with the video clips shared by Federal prosecutors as they argue that all of the clips purposely depicted Combs assaulting Cassie at the Intercontinental Hotel.

According to Conor’s findings “the video the government submitted to the Court omits footage corroborating the defense account, changes the sequence of events in material respects, and does not accurately depict the events.”