Cousins!

Now usually if it smells like a fish, tastes like a fish, looks like a fish…it’s a fish! However a recently amended lawsuit has gathered claims that the only thing the folks of Subway got going on these days is some FISHY BUSINESS!

As we previously reported earlier this year Subway had raised a few eyebrows after legal documents claimed that their signature tuna sub contained zero DNA of fish and a questionable unidentified mystery meat.

Though the brand has denied each claim forwarded while insisting that their beloved tunafish sandwich is indeed what they say it is, new lab reports within a now third lawsuit has allegedly discovered chicken, pork and cattle DNA.

According to the NY Post, It’s the third amended lawsuit filed against Subway this year by Karen Dhanowa and Nilima Amin.

Reports read that the latest lawsuit, issued on Monday, reads that there was a collection of 20 tuna samples from 20 different Subway restaurants in southern California that was then submitted for testing at the Barber Lab within UCLA’s Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology.

Legal documents support the claim that 19 of the 20 samples contained “no detectable tuna DNA sequences whatsoever.”

The lawsuit alleges that not only does the tuna sandwich raise questions but also every other signature sub the brand markets as being healthy, fresh and authentic.

“Defendants do not take sufficient measures to control or prevent the known risks of adulteration to its tuna products. On the contrary, they actively perpetuate actions and steps that encourage mixing or allowing non-tuna ingredients to make their way into the tuna products,” reads the forwarded suit.

A spokesman for the company argues that, “The plaintiffs have filed three meritless complaints, changing their story each time. This third, most recent amended claim, was filed only after their prior complaint was rightfully dismissed by a federal judge.”